Talk:Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Iron Nuclei
[edit]I've edit out the parts where it says that it's a proton, and replaced it with Iron Nuclei because of this article: the team has found evidence that these highest-energy cosmic rays might be iron nuclei, rather than the protons that make up most cosmic rays. http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100222/full/4631011a.html
Michel_sharp (talk) 23:10, 21 June 2015 (UTC+01:00)
10^20 ev corresponds to 7.7 * 10^23 kelvins
[edit]2* 10^20 ev/(3*Boltzmann's constant) = 7.7 * 10^23 kelvins
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Astro/timlin.html
Just granpa (talk) 18:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Relation with dark matter
[edit]It may be worth mentioning that the candidate dark matter particle mass -- 15 times the proton mass, or 1.4e10 eV -- has been excluded by later research. For example, Calmet & Kuipers[1] use quantum gravity to show that a particle heavier than about 1e7 eV needs to either interact with photons (hence not dark) or decay on a timescale shorter than the age of the universe (hence not a candidate for dark matter in today's universe).
But I'm not sure how to work this in or if this is even appropriate so I'm just leaving this here. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ Xavier Calmet and Folkert Kuipers, Theoretical bounds on dark matter masses, Physics Letters B, Volume 814 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136068 or https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269321000083
Extreme-energy cosmic ray
[edit]None of the sources refer to "Extreme-energy cosmic ray" by that term. The content related to that term does not match the article topic.
- This article is about UHECR "Astrophysicists ponder whether ultrahigh-energy particles really do come from the centre of galaxies." Hand, E (22 February 2010). "Cosmic-ray theory unravels". Nature. 463 (7284): 1011. doi:10.1038/4631011a. PMID 20182484.
- These are is about a hypothetical source, only one of many Honda, M.; Honda, Y. S. (2004). "Filamentary Jets as a Cosmic-Ray "Zevatron"". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 617 (1): L37 – L40. arXiv:astro-ph/0411101. Bibcode:2004ApJ...617L..37H. doi:10.1086/427067. S2CID 11338689. Osmanov, Z.; Mahajan, S.; Machabeli, G.; Chkheidze, N. (2014). "Extremely efficient Zevatron in rotating AGN magnetospheres". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 445 (4): 4155–4160. arXiv:1404.3176. Bibcode:2014MNRAS.445.4155O. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2042. S2CID 119195822.
I deleted the EECR section. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining the rationale for deletion here, John, since it again included one of my recent edits. 24.19.113.134 (talk) 23:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class Astronomy articles
- High-importance Astronomy articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles of High-importance
- C-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Low-importance